Honestly, being mindful of what you eat and how much is only 33% of the battle, even if executed with perfect knowledge and perfect technique.
This is still dieting.
Studies show that people on diets who adhere to it strictly for a year lose 10% of their starting weight. If you weigh 220 lbs, you'll weigh 198 after a year -- nowhere close to the figure you hoped for, and this is for people with
strict adherence to commercial weight loss programs!
The other 33% is cardio. I'm a big fan of Stronglifts.com but I disagree with them on that point -- from my own experience I think cardio is necessary for a balanced fitness program that not only targets how you look, but underlying health issues like cholesterol, blood pressure, and general cardiac/arterial/pulmonary health.
The last 33% is weight lifting. I would actually put this above cardio -- so if you had to cut one or the other for time reasons, I'd drop the cardio and go with weight training first. But a long term plan should include cardio, so I'd add it back in down the road.
So you have a 3-factor program: Diet, Cardio, Weights. If you're missing any one of them, you can still make do. If you're missing two of these factors then you'll likely make only marginal health gains.
It also doesn't bode well that EFT (and it's parent technique, Thought Field Techniques) are on
the QuackWatch list. Some of the behavioral therapy techniques
can be useful, but to market it as an all-you'll-ever-need program is just plain wrong.