| Author |
Message |
Tricia O.
traineo Fanatic Posts: 110
Tricia O.
just trying to get rid of 15-20 pounds... while going to graduate school full-time, working full-time and being a mom. care to be a motivator?
|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 14:13
Hi all,
I just purchased a brand new Health O Meter digital scale from Target in December at $19, and figured it's a good name brand, and $19 is a good buy.
Normally, when I post my weight I take the number off of the scale after my initial morning weigh-ins. Well, over the past couple of days, I've been weighing myself once, taking a minute-log break, and returning to the scale to make sure it weighed me correctly. This morning for instance, I weighed in at; 139, 137, 140, 131 and 138 respectively.
So, at 5am this morning, I'm feeling like my scale is messing with my emotions. Does anyone else have this problem? Or are your scales $100 ones with bells and whistles that don't ever have this problem?
Please help... I kind of rely on my weigh scale to help me track my progress.
thanks,
Tricia
|
Jack B.
traineo Fanatic Posts: 105
Jack B.
I lead a very busy life, so doing a diet and making time to work out is actually pretty difficult for me. I work for a school system fixing computers during the day, and work in youth ministry during the nighttime. It keeps me going. But it's harder to stay fit and healthy when you're so busy and convenience takes precedence over health. I'm working to change that. Hopefully, this will help.
|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 14:39
From Health O Meters own website:
When I step on the scale, the reading is not accurate. What could be wrong?
Our scales could differ +/- 1% of your total body weight.
Adjust the scale with the adjustment knob to ensure that the dial is on zero before weighing.
A hard surface is best for maximum accuracy.
Slightly leaning to the right, left, front, or back can cause the scale to provide a different reading for each direction that you lean.
If the scale has been dropped, it could be the cause of the problem.
Some things worth looking at. I know that this same thing happened to me before and it ended up being that my heels were slightly elevated off the scale, I guess it's good to maintain a good posture while you're weighing in.
As far as my scale, it's an old one, about 8 years old, I can't remember how much it cost us (it's a non digital) but it seems to be pretty accurate, but we're constantly having to calibrate it.
|
Shawn W.
Fitness Guru Posts: 490
Shawn W.
Looking to add some muscle over the next few months. Trying to get in those calories and focusing on the compound lifts. We'll see how it all goes :)
|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 16:21
I've been through a few scales as my son broke one playing on it, and the other was just a battery eating machine.
I have an old style one now that also fluctuates a little bit (2-4 lbs) depending on how you stand on it. It's hard to say if the more expensive ones are better, but I do feel that a good digital one is worth it as long as it doesn't eat batteries at a fast rate.
|
Aoife Hammersmith
Fitness Guru Posts: 254
Aoife Hammersmith
www.theaoife.org
Must get back down to me fightin' weight, darned stoopid holidays and their tasty treats...
Fer reel: A couple years ago I dropped from 200 to 120, and since I've been "maintaining" ... which has turned into a slight, slow gain. School leaves me with an excuse to not work out, and that has lead to my weight creeping up. After 20 pounds I fought hard to get off the first time I'm saying no more and working my fat bum back down into the 120s where it belongs.
I prefer lifting heavy but I've learned to not hate "cardio" and have even taken up running... sorta.
Of course, my fave pastimes are usually sedentary, my art, gaming, etc... But I can get over that.
|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 16:59
Our cheapie one a couple years ago was ass and did this. We ditched it. We have one that's in the 40-60 range and is good. It needs to be on a hard surface, and since there's 4 sensors that then aggregate their readings to give you the weight, you need to stand on it evenly. Ours fluctuates some, but not more than a pound.
Try calibrating it, that could be the problem.
Then make sure you stand the same every time.
If it's still crap, take it back.
Look for a smaller margin of error, a more precise measuring (accurate to w/i .2 pounds or something like that) would be better.
It may end up costing you more than $20, but it may not. Thinner is a good brand (what we have) but our p/o/s one was also a thinner so... *shrug* Just try them out till you have one that doesn't fluctuate by more than a pound or so. Or, just average your readings every day.
Only problem with that is what you have currently is giving you a 10 point range. 10 pounds is a lot. 10 pounds is more than just morning elimination and clothes. 10 pounds is usually a warning amount that you're getting too heavy (when you're in maintenance mode). So a 10 point range isn't overly helpful to you. If you can't get it to give you a smaller range by calibration and consistent weight distribution, find one that does.
|
Jack B.
traineo Fanatic Posts: 105
Jack B.
I lead a very busy life, so doing a diet and making time to work out is actually pretty difficult for me. I work for a school system fixing computers during the day, and work in youth ministry during the nighttime. It keeps me going. But it's harder to stay fit and healthy when you're so busy and convenience takes precedence over health. I'm working to change that. Hopefully, this will help.
|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 17:03
<confused> Aoife, what do you mean by maintenance mode? </confused>
|
Fred L
Fitness Guru Posts: 753


Fred L
I am 34 years old, married and a father of a 2.5 year old. They are the motivators for me to reach my goal. I started the new journey on 8/21/06 @307 lbs and as of June '08, I have lost around 108 lbs. I have been able to keep 100 lb weight loss since Sept. '07. What keeps me on track is the Traineo community, vision of a healthy and fit future and the mini-goals below. *GOAL 1 = 244 lbs, Date = 2/15/07 Date Met = 2/7/07 *GOAL 2 = 229 lbs, Date = 3/22/07 Date Met = 3/30/07 ________________________ *GOAL 3 = 199 lbs, Date = 6/30/08 Date Met = 6/5/08 *GOAL 4 = 185 lbs, Date = 09/30/08 Date Met = TBD (185 is my "ultimate" goal. Then build muscle.)
Hobbies/Interests: Baseball, White Sox, bowling, WII, Xbox 360, PSP, XM, Opie and Anthony radio show, Ron and Fez radio show, variety of music, working out, running.
Personal Records: 5K - 26:18 (4/14/08-8:29/mile pace) 10K- 54:56-9/16/07-(8:43/mile pace) 10 Mile Run - CXLD due to injury Marathon - 10/12/08
Advice: - Set a Deadline: "A goal is a dream with a deadline - Napolean Hill." - Set Mini Goals - They help you accomplish small milestones on your way to the "ultimate" goal. - Track your progress. - Plan everything out. Daily workout routines, meals, etc. - Be patient. Your goals will eventually be met, if you work hard.
Motivating Messages: - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEMEBBwO6J8
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3wuXyOUKJwfeature=related

|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 17:08
I have the one in the link below. I just have to calibrate once in a while after it gets moved around. I always have it in the bathroom on a hard floor.
URL
|
Heather C.
Fitness Guru Posts: 573
Heather C.
Back from my 2 weeks cycling in Germany and am predictably rather heavier than I was before I left. That's the Bier and Wurst for you. I'm back to JUDDD now and feel better for it, too. Shame I can't spend hours cycling anymore, though
|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 17:52
I think maintenance mode refers to a person's weight, not the scales. So once you've lost the weight and want to stay at that level, that is maintenance mode. Arguable the hardest part, since you don't have the elation of weight loss to keep you focussed on NOT dolloping mayo on everything.
|
Shawn W.
Fitness Guru Posts: 490
Shawn W.
Looking to add some muscle over the next few months. Trying to get in those calories and focusing on the compound lifts. We'll see how it all goes :)
|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 18:54
Agree with ya Heather.
Once you hit that weight and maintain it for a while it gets harder if you don't keep the motivation up all the time...
Maintance mode is fought off if you have a good friend/partner who you work out with on occasion and your both asking each other once a week or so how things are going.
|
Jack B.
traineo Fanatic Posts: 105
Jack B.
I lead a very busy life, so doing a diet and making time to work out is actually pretty difficult for me. I work for a school system fixing computers during the day, and work in youth ministry during the nighttime. It keeps me going. But it's harder to stay fit and healthy when you're so busy and convenience takes precedence over health. I'm working to change that. Hopefully, this will help.
|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 18:56
<enlightened> Thanks for the info Heather, most appreciated  </enlightened>
|
Aoife Hammersmith
Fitness Guru Posts: 254
Aoife Hammersmith
www.theaoife.org
Must get back down to me fightin' weight, darned stoopid holidays and their tasty treats...
Fer reel: A couple years ago I dropped from 200 to 120, and since I've been "maintaining" ... which has turned into a slight, slow gain. School leaves me with an excuse to not work out, and that has lead to my weight creeping up. After 20 pounds I fought hard to get off the first time I'm saying no more and working my fat bum back down into the 120s where it belongs.
I prefer lifting heavy but I've learned to not hate "cardio" and have even taken up running... sorta.
Of course, my fave pastimes are usually sedentary, my art, gaming, etc... But I can get over that.
|
# Posted: 1 Feb 2007 19:08
Maintenance mode is basically the maintaining of weight, otherwise known as the rest of your life. You're not trying to gain or lose, just maintain. For people who can't do this naturally, one still needs to keep a level (less than losing weight level) of alertness to what the scale says.
My sister can maintain her weight without a problem, but I'm inclined to slowly creep up a bit and maintain at a higher level than I want, because I want to be at a leanness that requires work to keep.
For some people this is really tough, because their natural inclination (and by "natural" I mean what they've conditioned themselves to be through living their lives) is to eat more than they expend, often because their natural selves are rather sedentary.
The way to overcome this toughness is to have goals that are not weight related. You want to be able to bench or squat a certain amount, you want to do a triathlon, you really like those size 5 jeans.
Some people find this rather easy. I'm somewhere in between. My sister finds it easy because a higher level of body-fat is acceptable to her. So she's in the "normal" range for a woman (as in charts normal, not necessarily what we see becoming the norm on the streets of America), whereas I want to be cut up. Trying to maintain a pretty lean body while being a naturally less active person makes it a bit tough. I can maintain "normal range" better, so long as I keep away from the cake.
So, especially if it's not easy for you to maintain your selected weight/body-fat level, you have to pay attention. You don't need to be all nazi-like, but daily weighings are a good idea. If your scale can't tell you you're on your way to gaining a few extra pounds... your jeans will.
But the scale would tell you first, thereby eliminating the need to sew that damn button back on your jeans.
|